Act 188 of 1982
When Act 188 of 1982 was first signed into law, some PASSHE
presidents dubbed it “The Autonomy Act.” This was a reference to the fact that
the 14 PASSHE universities would no longer be part of the Executive Branch of
State government. Specifically, the
presidents and universities would no longer report directly to the Pennsylvania
Secretary of Education, a member of the Governor’s Cabinet.
Prior to Act 188, presidents of the PASSHE universities were
political appointees who got their jobs by being nominated by the Governor and confirmed by
the Senate. The political nature
of the presidential appointments of that era is evidenced by stories of sitting
presidents being told, on the day that a new governor was inaugurated, to clear
out their desks by the close of business.
Clearly, under that purely political arrangement, presidents had to
recognize that they worked for the governor, and that their position was seen
by elected governors in Pennsylvania as just another political patronage
opportunity.
Act 188, on the other hand, created a public corporation that
is now known as the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, or PASSHE, and
as a result, presidents would now report to a Chancellor who, in turn, reported
to the PASSHE Board of Governors. So for
the first time, university presidents would be selected on the basis of merit
through national searches, rather than through their political connections to a
sitting Governor and/or the leadership of the State Senate.
Under Act 188, the PASSHE Chancellor would also be selected
through a national search process, and both the Chancellor and presidents would
work under contracts of employment that would presumably insulate them from the
vagaries of inconvenient election results after political campaigns for
governor.
Act 188 was also very forward looking in two key areas: 1) It
recognized and addressed forthrightly what the students to be served by public
higher education in Pennsylvania really wanted and needed. In that sense, Act 188 is very student-centered;
and 2) It anticipated that the State’s financial support for public higher
education would decline in the future, and would never again match its prior high
levels.
What Pennsylvania Students
Want and Need
The authors of Act 188 clearly understood what students wanted
and needed from Pennsylvania public higher education, as evidenced by the
statutory purpose of PASSHE enshrined in the law, namely: “High quality education
at the lowest possible cost to the students.”
The term ‘high quality education’ was wanted and needed by
students to enable them, as PASSHE graduates, to have a legitimate opportunity
to achieve the ‘American Dream’ in a competitive world.
And the term ‘at the lowest possible cost to the students’
was also wanted and needed to provide that very opportunity to the largest
possible number of Pennsylvania students, regardless of family income.
Declining Public
Support for Public Higher Education
For example, the state share of the PASSHE operating budget fell
from 63% in FY 1984 to just 27% in FY 2013! At the same time, PASSHE’s share of the
Commonwealth’s budget fell by more than one-half (from 2.90% to 1.14%). And finally, the State appropriation (in
constant dollars) per FTE student fell by 49%, meaning that for every State
dollar available to educate a student at the beginning of the PASSHE system in
1983, only 51 cents is available today.
Also, Act 188 empowered the PASSHE university presidents to
engage in private fund raising for the first time. Prior to passage of Act 188, a directive from
the Secretary of Education notified all presidents that for every dollar
received at a PASSHE university from a private source, a like amount would be
deducted from their university’s State appropriation—thereby nullifying any
benefit from private fund raising!
Finally, Act 188 authorized the Board of
Governors to set tuition rates across all universities, and the Councils of
Trustees to set fees at individual universities. PASSHE’s nominal annual tuition increased
from $1,480 in 1983 to $6,428 in 2013, an increase of 334%, with 248% of that
due to a weakening dollar, and 86% of that due to the actual increase in
purchasing power needed to cover annual tuition.
No comments:
Post a Comment