Win-Win Agreements
Career success requires the initiation and maintenance over
time of win-win agreements between the employer and the employee. And since each party to a win-win agreement
must decide for itself what constitutes a win in any given situation, potential
agreements must be viewed from both points of view.
Financially speaking, every employee represents an expense to an organization and for that
reason employers only create and/or refill a position if they perceive: 1) that
they have a problem that must be solved
in order to achieve an important organizational goal, and 2) that the right employee hired to fill that position—and
not just any employee— represents a solution to that problem.
An Employer’s
Problem to be Solved
The first perception—recognizing a problem to be solved—is usually
internal to the employer and the organization as they engage in the typical
management process of deciding what the highest priorities will be for the precious
financial resources available. Real
world organizations rarely perceive fewer problems than the resources necessary
to solve them and, for that reason some triage is inevitably required, i.e.,
deciding “What are the critical problems that cannot be safely postponed any
longer?”
Although usually an internal organizational matter not
involving the potential employee, there is considerable evidence that
entrepreneurial individuals, and companies for that matter, have helped to
create opportunities for themselves
by convincing other individuals and companies that they have problems they
didn’t realize they had. Think, for
example, of any number of media ads that try to convince a person that they,
their spouse, their child or even their cat may have a problem they never thought
of, whether it be halitosis, gas and bloating, autism or questions about urinary
tract health.
But some employees—especially those already working inside
an organization and/or those with a keen understanding of the “industry” of
which the organization in question is a part—can sometimes alert an employer to
opportunities or threats that they either had not yet become aware of or, perhaps,
had not yet completely dealt with. This
is true of any number of the new or promising professions that grow out of
public acceptance of external realities such as, e.g., emerging technologies and/or
changes in the law.
For example, although Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights
Act were passed in 1964, it was years before every large organization, and many
small ones, created positions for “social equity” officers to steer employers
safely through the potential minefield of lawsuits and jury awards as those
laws took effect.
Similarly, the explosion in computer and internet
technologies saw the creation of a new high-level officer, the C.I.T.O., or
chief information technology officer, along with many additional staff positions.
Some positions are created at the suggestion of the employee
who understands the internal and external environments of the organization so
well, that they are able to spot enormous opportunities for, or existential
threats to, the organization long before they become obvious to everyone else.
So while most positions become known through job postings by
the employer, others can be and have been created by employers in response to
the suggestions of employees or outside observers.
The Employee as a Solution
to the Problem
Prospective employees usually become aware of an employment
opportunity only after the employer has posted the position in question. Career success, defined as gainful
employment, will then require the potential employee to work to be seen by the
employer as the solution to the employer’s problem.
Potential employees should realize that if employment
opportunities get posted publicly, employers may be less than candid about what
they see as the real problem to be solved.
In today’s competitive world, most employers do not want their
competitors to know what problems they face or are working to solve. As a result, the job posting may be vague or
otherwise unhelpful.
However, research
into available organization documents, as well as data on the overall industry,
may help the astute employee anticipate what the employer’s real problem might
be. Also, as one gets farther into the employee
screening process through interviews, for example, it often becomes much
clearer as to what the organization’s problem really is, and how the position
in question is expected to contribute to a solution.
To be successful, the employee needs to understand, and
credibly respond to, the true nature of the employer’s perceived problem before
having any chance of being seen as a solution to that problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment